Which statement about joint physical custody is true?

The concept of joint physical custody primarily revolves around the idea that both parents have substantial and meaningful time with their child, although this time does not have to be equal. This type of custody allows for a flexible arrangement where the child can maintain a fulfilling relationship with both parents.

Joint physical custody recognizes that the best interests of the child are served when they can regularly spend time with each parent, contributing to their emotional and relational needs. Therefore, while one parent might have the child for slightly more days in a given week, it still constitutes joint physical custody, as both parents are significantly involved in the child's life.

The other choices miss crucial aspects of joint physical custody. The notion of requiring an equal split of time between parents does not account for the various arrangements that can still meet the criteria of being "joint." Additionally, the idea that only one parent can make significant decisions misrepresents the nature of joint custody, as major decisions typically involve both parents in shared legal custody arrangements. Finally, while joint physical custody does indeed address the time spent with the child, it does not rely on the concept of the child's residence being fixed to one location, as the arrangement can involve the child living in different homes.