Which of the following is a remedy for enforcement of child custody orders?

The remedy for enforcement of child custody orders is contempt of court. When a parent or guardian fails to comply with a custody order, the other party may seek enforcement through the court. The court may hold a hearing to determine if there has been a violation of the custody order and, if so, can impose sanctions on the violating party.

Contempt of court serves as a powerful mechanism to ensure compliance with judicial orders. This civil enforcement action can result in various penalties, including fines, modification of custody arrangements, or even jail time in severe cases where the violation is flagrant. The goal of invoking contempt is to compel the offending party to comply with the order rather than to punish them, although consequences can still be severe if compliance does not occur.

Other options, such as mediation, can be effective for resolving disputes but do not have the same enforcement power as contempt. Child support adjustment typically pertains to financial obligations and is not directly related to custody enforcement. Voluntary relocation does not address enforcement issues; instead, it involves parental decisions regarding the movement of a child or custody-holder, which may require prior approval if affecting an existing custody arrangement. Therefore, contempt of court is the specific legal remedy designed to enforce child custody orders directly.